Chi Haotian was the defense minister of China from 1993-2003. He was also vice chairman of the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Military Commission. He delivered the following speech to a select group of high level party cadres.
As explained in Gen. Chi’s speech, the Chinese Communist Party’s intention is to militarily defeat, occupy, and colonize the United States. This plan has been confirmed by a Russian defector source who worked in China and had information about a joint Sino-Russian plan to invade North America. This plan was drawn up in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union. The division of spoils was described thus: “Russia would get Alaska and parts of Canada. China would get the lower 48 states, with other countries invited in for ‘looting rights.’”
The speech was translated into English and first published by the EPOCH TIMES in 2005.
Comrades,
I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our party’s cause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war,” more than 80 percent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations.
Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands, [where I] mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of “peace and development” had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase. I also mention we have a vital stake overseas. Today, I’ll speak more specifically on these two issues.
The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people’s attitude toward war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even non-combatants, they’ll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war.
Actually, however, this is not our genuine intention. The purpose of the CCP Central Committee in conducting this survey is to probe people’s minds. We wanted to know: If China’s global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?
As everybody knows, the essence of Comrade Xiaoping’s thinking is “development is the hard truth.” And Comrade Jintao, has also pointed out repeatedly and emphatically that “development is our top priority,” which should not be neglected for even a moment. But many comrades tend to understand “development” in its narrow sense, assuming it to be limited to domestic development. The fact is, our “development” refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world.
Why do I put it this way?
Both Comrade Liu Huaquing, one of the leaders of the old generation in our Party, and Comrade He Xin, a young strategist of our Party, have repeatedly stressed the theory regarding the shift of the center of World Civilization. Our slogan of “revitalizing China” has this way of thinking as its basis. You may look into the newspapers and magazines published in recent years or go online to do some research to find out who raised the slogan of national revitalization first. It was Comrade He Xin. Do you know who He Xin is? He may look aggressive and despicable when he speaks in public, with his sleeves and pants all rolled up, but his historical vision is a treasure our Party should cherish.
{JRN NOTE: Thus, the exploitation of nationalism and Chinese racism is openly avowed as an adjunct to communist expansionism – as Chinese National Socialism.]
In discussing this issue, let us start from the beginning.
As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in Africa. Therefore, no race can claim racial superiority. However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. The Peking Man at Zhoukoudian that we are all familiar with represents a phase of our ancestors’ evolution. “The Project of Searching for the Origins of the Chinese Civilization” currently undertaken in our country is aimed at a more comprehensive and systematic research on the origin, process and development of the ancient Chinese civilization. We use to say, “Chinese civilization has had a history of five thousand years.” But now, many experts engaged in research in varied fields including archeology, ethnic cultures, and regional cultures have reached consensus that the new discoveries such as the Hongshan Culture in the northeast, the Liangahn Cutlure in Zhejiang province, the Jinsha Ruins in Sichuan province, and the Yongzhou Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Hunan province are all compelling evidence of the exitence of China’s early civilizations, and they prove that China’s rice-growing agricultural history alone can be traced back as far as 8,000 to 10,000 years. This refutes the concept of “five thousand years of Chinese civilization.”
Therefore, we can assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself, “descendants of Yan and Huang,” the Chinese nation that we are so proud of. Hitler’s Germany had once bragged that the German race was the most superior race on earth, but the fact is, our nation is far superior to the Germans.
During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific.
We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the center of the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center of the world shifted to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the center of the world civilization shift back to China?
Comrade He Xin put it in his report to the Central Committee in 1988: If the fact is that the center of leadership of the world was located in Europe as of the 18th Century, and later shifted to the United States in the mid-20th century the center of leadership of the world will shift to the East of our planet. And, “the East” of course mainly refers to China.
Actually, Comrade Lui Huaquing made similar points in the 1980s. Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the center of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th century as the British century, and the 20th century as the American century, then the 21st century will be the Chinese century.
{JRN NOTE: Here is a Chinese version of ‘Manifest Destiny,” with the whole world as its object of conquest.}
To understand conscientiously this historical law and to greet the advent of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of our Party. As we all know, at the end of the last century, we built the Altar to the Chinese Century in Beijing.
At the very moment of the arrival of the new millennium, the collective leadership of the Party Central Committee gathered there for a rally, upholding the torches of Zhoukoudian, to pledge themselves to get ready to greet the arrival of the Chinese Century. We were doing this to follow the historical law and setting the realization of the Chinese century as the goal of our Party’s endeavors.
Later, in the political report of our Party’s Sixteenth National Congress, we established that national revitalization should be our great objective and explicitly specified in our new Party Constitution that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese people. All these steps marked a major development in Marxism, reflecting our Party’s courage and wisdom. As we all know, Marx and his followers have never referred to any communist party as a pioneer of a certain people; neither did they say that national revitalization could be used as a slogan of a communist party. Even Comrade Mao Zedong, a courageous national hero, only raised high the banner of “the global proletarian revolution,” but even he did not have the courage to give the loudest publicity to the slogan of national revitalization.
We must greet the arrival of the Chinese Century by raising high the banner of national revitalization. How should we fight for the realization of the Chinese Century? We must borrow the precious experiences in human history by taking advantage of the outstanding fruition of human civilization and drawing lessons from what happened to other ethnic groups.
The lessons include the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, as well as the defeats of Germany and Japan in the past. Recently there has been much discussion of the lessons of the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries, so I will not dwell on them here. Today I’d like to talk about the lessons of Germany and Japan.
As we all know, Nazi Germany also placed much emphasis on the education of the people, especially the younger generation. The Nazi Party and government organized and established various propaganda and educational institutions such as the “Guiding Bureau of National Propaganda,” “Department of National Education and Propaganda,” “Supervising Bureau of Worldview Study and Education,” and “Information Office,” all aimed at instilling into the people’s minds, from elementary schools to colleges, the idea that German people are superior, and convincing people that the historical mission of the Aryan people is to become the “lords of the earth” whose right it is to “rule over the world.” Back then the German people were much more united than we are today.
Nonetheless, Germany was defeated in utter shame, along with its ally, Japan. Why? We reached some conclusions at the study meetings of the Politburo, in which we were searching for the laws that governed the vicissitudes of the big powers, and trying to analyze Germany and Japan’s rapid growth. When we decide to revitalize based on the German model, we must not repeat the mistakes they made.
Specifically, the following are the fundamental causes for their defeat: First, they had too many enemies all at once, as they did not adhere to the principle of eliminating enemies one at a time; second, they were too impetuous, lacking the patience and perseverance required for great accomplishments; third, when the time came for them to be ruthless, they turned out to be too soft, therefore leaving troubles that resurfaced later on.
Let’s presume that back then Germany and Japan had been able to keep the United States neutral and had fought a protracted war step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this approach, gained some time to advance their research, eventually succeeded in obtaining the technology of nuclear weapons and missiles, and launched surprise attacks against the United States and the Soviet Union using them, then the United States and the Soviet Union would not have been able to defend themselves and would have had to surrender. Little Japan, in particular, made an egregious mistake in launching the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. This attack did not hit the vital parts of the United States. Instead, it dragged the United States into the war, into the ranks of the gravediggers that eventually buried the German and Japanese fascists.
Of course, if they had not made these three mistakes and won the war, history would have been written in a different fashion. If that had been the case, China would not be in our hands. Japan might have relocated their capital to China and ruled over China. Afterwards, China and the whole of Asia under Japan’s command would have brought into full play the oriental wisdom, conquered the West ruled by Germany and unified the whole world. This is irrelevant, of course. No more digressions.
So, the fundamental reason for the defeats of Germany and Japan is that history did not arrange them to be the “lords of the earth,” for they are, after all, not the most superior race.
Ostensibly, in comparison, today’s China is alarmingly similar to Germany back then. Both of them regard themselves as the most superior races; both of them have a history of being exploited by foreign powers and are therefore vindictive; both of them have the tradition of worshipping their own authorities; both of them feel that they have seriously insufficient living space; both of them raise high the two banners of nationalism and socialism and label themselves as “national socialism”; both of them worship “one state, one party, one leader, and one doctrine.”
And yet, if we really are to make a comparison between Germany and China, then, as Comrade Jiang Zemin put it, Germany belongs to “pediatrics” – too trivial to be compared. How large is Germany’s population? How big is its territory? And how long is its history? We eliminated eight million nationalist troops in only three years. How many enemies did Germany kill? They were in power for a transient period of little more than a dozen years before they perished, while we are still energetic after being around for more than eighty years. Our theory of the shifting center of civilization is of course more profound than Hitler’s theory of “the lords of the earth.” Our civilization is profound and broad, which has determined that we are so much wiser than they were.
Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages.
This heritage determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined “not to be buried by either heaven or earth” no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage.
Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, these enemies would reach Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things. Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, “The Party’s leadership is prompt in making decisions. Once a decision is made, it is immediately implemented. There’s no wasting time on trivial things like in capitalist countries. This is our advantage! Our Party’s democratic centralism is built on the tradition of great unity. Although fascist Germany also stressed high-level centralism, they only focused on power of the top leader, but ignored the collective leadership of the central group. That’s why Hitler was betrayed by many later in his life, which fundamentally depleted the Nazis of their war capacity.
What makes us different from Germany is that we are complete atheists, while Germany was primarily a Catholic and Protestant country. Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed that ordinary citizens had low intelligence, and that leaders should therefore make decisions, and although German people worshipped Hitler back then, Germany did not have the tradition of worshipping sages on a broad basis. Our Chinese society has always worshipped sages, and that is because we don’t worship any God. Once you worship a god, you can’t worship a person at the same time, unless you recognize the person as the god’s representative like they do in Middle Eastern countries. On the other hand, once you recognize a person as a sage, of course you will want him to be your leader…. This is the foundation of our democratic centralism.
The bottom line is, only China is a reliable force in resisting the Western parliament-based democratic system. Hitler’s dictatorship in Germany was perhaps but a momentary mistake in history.
Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people don’t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leaving God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China?
Germany’s dream to be the “lord of the earth” failed, because ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission upon them. But the three lessons Germany learned from experience are what we ought to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our race. The three lessons are: Firmly grasp the country’s living space; firmly grasp the Party’s control over the nation; and firmly grasp the general direction toward becoming the “lord of the earth.”
Next, I’d like to address these three issues.
The first issue is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany’s back then. In addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact, and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much greater than faced by Germany back then.
Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered by a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it can’t be drunk without filtering. They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential building; in contrast, our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have to share on room.
Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our limited resources would not long support the population and society would collapse, once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue.
But the term ‘living space’ (lebensraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany. The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s new theory, “Human rights are just living rights,” we only talk about “living,” but not “space,” so as to avoid using the term “living space.” From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries established colonies ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they could develop outside of China.
The second issue is our focus on the leadership capacity of the ruling party. We’ve done better on this than their party. Although the Nazis spread their power to every aspect of the German national government, they did not stress their absolute leadership position like we have. They did not take the issue of managing the power of the party as first priority, which we have. When Comrade Mao Zedong summarized the “three treasures” of our party’s victory in conquering the country, he considered the most important “treasure” to be developing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and strengthening its leadership position.
We have to focus on two points to fortify our leadership position and improve our leadership capacity.
The first is to promote the “Three Represents” theory, stressing that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese race, in addition to being the pioneer of the proletariat. Many citizens say in private, “We never voted for you, the Communist Party, to represent us. How can you claim to be our representatives?”
There’s no need to worry about this issue. Comrade Mao Zedong said that if we could lead the Chinese people outside of China, resolving the lack of living space in China, the Chinese people will support us. At that time, we don’t’ have to worry about the labels of “totalitarianism” or “dictatorship.” Whether we can forever represent the Chinese people depends on whether we can succeed in leading the Chinese people out of China.
The second point, whether we can lead the Chinese people out of China, is the most important determinant of the CCP’s leadership position.
Why do I say this?
Everyone knows that without the leadership of our Party, China would not exist today. Therefore, our highest principle is to forever protect our Party’s leadership position. Before June 4, we realized vaguely that as long as China’s economy is developed, people would support and love the Communist Party. Therefore we had to use several decades of peacetime to develop China’s economy. No matter what-isms, whether it is a white cat or a black at, it is a good cat if it can develop China’s economy. But at that time, we did not have mature ideas about how China would deal with international disputes after its economy becomes developed.
Comrade Xiaoping said then that the main themes in the world were peace and development. But the June 4 riot gave our Party a warning and gave us a lesson that is still fresh.
The pressure of China’s peaceful evolution makes us reconsider of these two main themes of our time. We see that neither of these two issues, peace and development, have been resolved. The western oppositional forces always change the world according to their own visions; they want to change China and use peaceful evolution to overturn the leadership of our Communist Party. Therefore, if we only develop the economy, we still face the possibility of losing control.
The June 4 riot almost succeeded in bringing a peaceful transition; if it were not for the fact that a large number of veteran comrades were still alive and at a crucial moment they removed Zhao Ziyang and his followers, then we all would have been put in prison. After death we would have been too ashamed to report to Marx. Although we have passed the test of June 4, after our group of senior comrades pass away, without our control, peaceful evolution may still come to China like it did to the former Soviet Union. In 1956, they suppressed the Hungarian incident and defeated the attacks by Tito’s revisionists of Yugoslavia, but they could not withstand Gorbachev thirty some years later. Once those pioneering senior comrades died, the power of the Communist Party was taken away by peaceful evolution.
After the June 4 riot was suppressed, we have been thinking about how to prevent China from peaceful evolution and how to maintain the Communist Party’s leadership. We thought it over and over but did not come up with any good ideas. If we do not have good ideas, China will inevitably change peacefully, and we will all become criminals in history. After some deep pondering, we finally come to this conclusion: Only by turning our developed national strength into the force of a first striking outward – only by leading people to go out – can we win forever the Chinese people’s support and love for the Communist Party. Our party will then stand on invincible ground, and the Chinese people will have to depend on the Communist Party. They will forever follow the Communist Party with their hearts and minds, as was written in a couplet frequently seen in the countryside some years ago: “Listen to Chairman Mao, follow the Communist Party!” Therefore, the June 4 riot made us realize that we must combine economic development with preparation for war and leading the people to go out! Therefore, since then, our national defence policy has taken a 180 degree turn and we have since emphasized more and more “combining peace and war.” Our economic development is all about preparing for the needs of war! Publicly we still emphasize economic development as our center, but in reality, economic development has war as its center! We have made a tremendous effort to construct “The Great Wall Project” to build up, along our coastal and land frontiers as well as around large and medium-sized cities, a solid underground “Great Wall” that can withstand a nuclear war. We are also storing all necessary war materials. Therefore, we will not hesitate to fight a Third World War, so as to lead the people to go out and to ensure the Party’s leadership position. In any event, we, the CCP, will never step down from the stage of history! We’d rather have the whole world, or even the entire globe, share life and death with us than step down from the stage of history! Isn’t there a “nuclear bondage” theory? It means that since nuclear wepaons have bound the security of the entire world, all will die together if death is inevitable. In my view, there is another kind of bondage, and that is, the fate of our Party is tied up with that of the whole world. If we, the CCP, are finished, China will be finished, and the world will be finished.
Our Party’s historical mission is to lead the Chinese people to go out. If we take the long view, we will see that history led us on this path. First, China’s long history has resulted in the world’s largest population, including Chinese in China as well as overseas. Second, once we open our doors, the profit-seeking western capitalists will invest capital and technology in China to assist our development, so that they can occupy the biggest market in the world. Third, our numerous overseas Chinese help us create the most favorable environment for the introduction of foreign capital, foreign technology, and advanced experience into China. Thus, it is guaranteed that our reform and open-door policy will achieve tremendous success. Fourth, China’s great economic expansion will inevitably lead to the shrinkage of per-capita living space for the Chinese people, and this will encourage China to turn outward in search for new living space. Fifth, China’s great economic expansion will inevitably come with significant development in our military forces, creating conditions for our expansion overseas. Ever since Napoleon’s time, the West has been alert for the possible awakening of the sleeping lion that is China. Now, the sleeping lion is standing up and advancing into the world, and has become unstoppable!
What is the third issue we should clinch firmly in order to accomplish our historical mission of national renaissance? It is to hold firmly onto the big “issue of America.”
This appears to be shocking, but the logic is actually very simple.
Comrade He Xin put forward a very fundamental judgment that is very reasonable. He asserted in his report to the Party Central Committee: The renaissance of China is in fundamental conflict with the Western strategic interest, and therefore will inevitably be obstructed by the western countries doing everything they can. So, Only by breaking the blockade formed by the western countries headed by the United States can China grow and move toward the world!
Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, [so] how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.
Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the white race. We the descendants of the Chinese nation are entitled to the possession of the land! It is said that the residents of the yellow race have a very low social status in the United States. We need to liberate them. Second, after solving the “issue of America,” the western countries of Europe would bow to us, not to mention Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the mission assigned to the CCP members by history.
I sometimes think how cruel it is for China and the United States to be enemies that are bound to meet on a narrow road! Do you remember a movie about Liberation Army Troops led by Liu Bocheng and Deng Xiaoping? The title is something like “Decisive Battle on the Central Plains.” There is a famous remark in the movie that is full of power and grandeur: “The enemies are bound to meet on a narrow road, only the brave will win!” It is this kind of fighting to win or die spirit that enabled us to seize power in Mainland China. It is historical destiny that China and the United States will come to unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight each other! The United States, unlike Russia and Japan, has never occupied and hurt China, and also assisted China in its battle against the Japanese. But, it will certainly be an obstruction, and the biggest obstruction! In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.
One time, some Americans came to visit and tried to convince us that the relationship between China and the United States is one of interdependence. Comrade Xiaoping replied in a polite manner: “Go tell your government, China and the United States do not have such a relationship that is interdependent and mutually reliant.” Actually, Comrade Xiaoping was being too polite, he could have been more frank, “The relationship between China and the United States is one of life-and-death struggle.” Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology, we still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country.
How have we managed our foreign affairs in these years? Even if we had to put on a smiling face in order to please them, even if we have to give them the right cheek after they had hit our left cheek, we still must endure in order to further our relationship with the United States. Do you remember the character of Wuxun in the movie the “Story of Wuxun”? In order to accomplish his mission, he endured so much pain and suffered so much beating and kicking! The United States is the most successful country in the world today. Only after we have learned all of its useful experiences can we replace it in the future. Even though we are presently imitating the American tone “China and the United States rely on each other and share honor and disgrace,” we must not forget that the history of our civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to live together.
We also must never forget what Comrade Xiaoping emphasized: “Refrain from revealing ambitions and put others off the track.” The hidden message is: we must put up with America; we must conceal our ultimate goals, hide our capabilities, and await the opportunity. In this way, our mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national anthem with something peaceful? Why did we not change the anthem’s theme of war? Instead, when revising the Constitution this time, for the first time we clearly specified “March of the Volunteers” is our national anthem. Thus we will understand why we constantly talk loudly about the “Taiwan issue” but not the “American issue.” We all know the principle of “doing one thing under the cover of another.” If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan in their eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able to see the whole picture of our cause. Over these years, according to Comrade Xiaoping’s arrangement, a large piece of our territory in the North has been given up to Russia; do you really think our Party Committee is a fool?
To resolve the issue of America we must be able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered land because back then you could not kill people effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns. Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would not be able to make many people migrate there.
Only by using special means to “clean up” America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not. What kind of special means is there available for us to “clean up America”?
Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio-weapons have been invented one after another. Of course, we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of “cleaning up” America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to “clean up” America and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us.
Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place. According to the computation of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who knows how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half the population will have to go.
We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack, the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can only move forward fearlessly, for the sake of our Party and State and our nation’s future, regardless of the hardships we have to face and the sacrifices we have to make. The population, even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone.
In Chinese history, in the replacement of dynasties, the ruthless have always won and the benevolent have always failed. The most typical example involved Xiang Yu the King of Chu, who, after defeating Liu Bang, failed to continue to chase after him and eliminate his forces, and his leniency resulted in Xiang Yu’s death and Liu’s victory …. Therefore, we must emphasize the importance of adopting resolute measures. In the future, the two rivals, China and the United States, will eventually meet each other in a narrow road, and our leniency to the Americans will mean cruelty toward the Chinese people. Here some people may want to ask me: What about the several millions of our compatriots in the United States? They may ask: aren’t we against Chinese killing other Chinese?
These comrades are too pedantic; they are not pragmatic enough. If we had insisted on the principle that the Chinese should not kill other Chinese, would we have liberated China? As for the several million Chinese living in the United States, this is of course a big issue. Therefore, in recent years, we have been conducting research on genetic weapons, i.e., those weapons that do not kill yellow people. But producing a result with this kind of research is extremely difficult.
Of the research done on genetic weapons throughout the world, Israel is the most advanced. Their genetic weapons are designed to target Arabs and protect the Israelis. But even they have not reached the stage of actual deployment. We have cooperated with Israel on some research. Perhaps we can introduce some of the technologies used to protect Israelis and remold these technologies to protect the yellow people. But their technologies are not mature yet, and it is difficult for us to surpass them in a few years. If it has to be five or ten years before some breakthrough can be achieved in genetic weapons, we cannot afford to wait any longer.
Old comrades like us cannot afford to wait that long, for we don’t have that much time to live. Old soldiers of my age may be able to wait for five or ten more years, but those from the period of the anti-Japanese War or the few old Red Army soldiers cannot wait any longer.
Therefore, we have to give up our expectations about genetic weapons. Of course, from another perspective, the majority of those Chinese living in the United States have become our burden, because they have been corrupted by the bourgeois liberal values for a long time and it would be difficult for them to accept our Party’s leadership. If they survived the war, we would have to launch campaigns in the future to deal with them, to reform them. Do you still remember that when we had just defeated the Koumintang (KMT) and liberated Mainland China, so many people from the bourgeois class and intellectuals welcomed us so very warmly, but later we had to launch campaigns such as the “suppression of the reactionaries” and “Anti-Rightist Movement” to clean them up and reform them? Some of them were in hiding for a long time and were not exposed until the Cultural Revolution. History has proved that any social turmoil is likely to involve many deaths.
Maybe we can put it this way: death is the engine that moves history forward. During the period of the three kingdoms, how many people died? When Genghis Khan conquered Eurasia, how many people died? When Manchu invaded the interior of China, how many people died? Not many people died during the 1911 Revolution, but when we overthrew the Three Great Mountains, and during the political campaigns such as “suppression of the reactionaries,” “Three-Anti-Campaign,” and “Five-Anti-Campaign,” at least 20 million people died. We were apprehensive that some young people today would be trembling with fear when they hear about wars and people dying.
During wartime, we were used to seeing dead people. Blood and flesh were flying everywhere, corpses were lying in heaps on the fields, and blood ran like rivers. We saw it all. On the battlefields, everybody’s eyes turned red with killing because it was a life-and-death struggle and only the brave would survive.
It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths. But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party. That is because, after all, we are Chinese and members of the CCP. Since the day we joined the CCP, the Party, life has always been above all else! History will prove that we made the right choice.
Now, when I am about to finish my speech, you probably understand why we wanted to know, whether the people would rise against us if one day we secretly adopt resolute means to “clean up” America. For over twenty years, China has been enjoying peace, and a whole generation has not been tested by war. In particular, since the end of World War II, there have been many changes in the formats of war, the concept of war and the ethics of war. Especially since the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European Communist states, the ideology of the West has come to dominate the world as a whole, and the Western theory of human nature and western view of human rights have increasingly been disseminated among the young people in China. Therefore, we were not very sure about the people’s attitude. If our people are fundamentally opposed to “cleaning up” America, we will, of course, have to adopt corresponding measures.
Why didn’t we conduct the survey through administrative means instead of through the web? We did what we did for a good reason.
First of all, we did it to reduce artificial inference and to make sure that we got the true thoughts of the people. In addition, it is more confidential and won’t reveal the true purpose of our survey. But what is most important is the fact that most of the people who are able to respond to the questions online are from social groups that are relatively well-educated and intelligent. They are the hard-core and leading groups that play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, then the people as a whole will follow us. If they oppose us, they will play the dangerous role of inciting people and creating social disturbance.
What turned out to be very comforting is they did not turn in a blank test paper. In fact, they turned in a test paper with a score of over 80. This is the excellent fruition of our Party’s work in propaganda and education over the past few decades.
Of course, a few people under western influence have objected to shooting at prisoners of war and women and children. Is everybody crazy? Some others said, “The Chinese love to label themselves as a peace-loving people, but actually they are the most ruthless people. The comments are resonant of killing and murdering, sending chills to my heart.”
Although there are not too many people holding this kind of viewpoint and they will not affect the overall situation in any significant way, but we still need to strengthen the propaganda to respond to this kind of argument.
That is to vigorously propagate Comrade He Xin’s latest article, which has already been reported to the central government. You may look it up on the website.
If you get on the website using key words to search, you will find out that a while ago comrade He Xin pointed out to the Hong Kong Business News during an interview that: “The U.S. has a shocking conspiracy.” According to what he had in hand, from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev Foundation, funded by the United States, gathered 500 of the world’s most important statesmen, economic leaders and scientists, including George W. Bush (he was not the U.S. president at the time), the Baroness Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist John Naisbitt, etc., all of the world’s most popular characters, in the San Francisco Fairmont hotel for a high-level roundtable conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide humanity to move forward into the 21st century. According to what He Xin had in hand, the outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20 percent of the world’s population will be sufficient to maintain the world’s economy and prosperity, the other 80 percent or 4/5ths of the world’s population will be human garbage unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80 percent population would be a trash population and “high-tech” means should be used to eliminate them gradually.
{JRN note: In this bit of mirror-imaging we find the very likeness of the Communist Bloc in terms of war plans involving the use of weapons of mass destruction. It is bizarre to assert there is a similar intention in the West, which is politically and socially incapable of following through on any such plans. Was the San Francisco event a provocation?}
Since the enemies are secretly planning to eliminate our population, we certainly cannot be infinitely merciful and compassionate to them. Comrade He Xin’s article came out at the right time, it has proven the correctness of our tit for tat battle approach … [and] Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s great foresight to deploy against the United States military strategy.
Certainly, in spreading Comrade He Xin’s views, we cannot publish the article in the Party newspapers, in order to avoid raising the enemy’s vigilance. He Xin’s conversation may remind the enemy that we have grasped the modern science and technology, including “clean” nuclear technology as well as biological weapons technology, and we can use powerful measures to eliminate their population on a large scale.
{JRN note: General Chi makes a subtle point. They cannot hide everything, but they can hide what is most alarming and most decisive.}
The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle.
Currently, we are at the crossroad of moving forward or backward. Some comrades saw problems flooding everywhere in our country – the corruption problem, the state-owned enterprise problem, the bank’s bad accounts problem, environmental problems, society security problems, education problems, the AIDS problem, various appeals problems, even the riots problem. These comrades vacillated in the determination to prepare for military battles. They thought: they should first grab the political reform problem, that is, our own political reform comes first. After resolving the domestic problems, we can then deal with the foreign military battle problem.
This reminds me of the crucial period in 1948 in the Chinese Revolution. At that time the People’s Liberation Army’s “horses were drinking water” in the Yangtze River, but they faced extremely complex situations and difficult problems everywhere in the liberated areas, and the central authority received emergency reports daily. What to do? Should we stop to manage rear areas and internal matters first before moving forward, or press on to pass the Yangtze River with one vigorous effort? Chairman Mao, with his extraordinary wisdom and mettle gave the marching order “Carry on the revolution to the end,” and liberated all of China. The previously thought “serious” conflicting problems were all resolved in this great forward moving revolutionary wave.
Now, it seems like we are in the same critical period as the “horses were drinking water” in the Yangtze River days in the revolutionary era, as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites.
Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of China’s century. As war approaches, I am full of hope for our next generation.
Dưới đây là một phần bài phát biểu của Tướng Trì Hạo Điền - nguyên Bộ trưởng Bộ Quốc phòng Trung Quốc tại Hội nghị các tướng lĩnh bàn về chiến lược chiến tranh tương lai tổ chức năm 2005...
(Tài liệu được công bố trên Tạp chí Các vấn đề chiến lược, Ấn Độ, 15.4.2009).
"Như mọi người đều biết, theo quan điểm truyền bá của các học giả phương Tây, toàn thể loài người trên Trái Đất có nguồn gốc chung từ một người mẹ duy nhất ở Châu Phi. Như vậy, không một chủng tộc nào có thể tự nhận mình là chủng tộc siêu đẳng nhất. Tuy nhiên, theo các nghiên cứu của đại đa số các học giả Trung Quốc, người Trung Quốc khác với các chủng tộc khác trên thế giới. Chúng ta không có nguồn gốc từ Châu Phi. Trái lại, chúng ta có nguồn gốc độc lập trên đất Trung Quốc. Nguời Bắc Kinh ở Chu Khẩu Điếm mà tất cả chúng ta đều bắt nguồn từ đó đại diện cho một giai đoạn tiến hoá của tổ tiên chúng ta.
NGUỒN GỐC NỀN VĂN MINH TRUNG HOA
Trước đây, chúng ta thường nói rằng nền văn minh Trung Quốc có lịch sử 5.000 năm. Nhưng hiện nay, rất nhiều chuyên gia nghiên cứu trong nhiều lĩnh vực khác nhau, trong đó có khảo cổ học, văn hóa sắc tộc, và văn hoá khu vực đã đi tới một sự thống nhất rằng các phát hiện mới như nền văn hoá Hongshan ở vùng Đông Bắc, nền văn hoá Liangzu ở tỉnh Chiết Giang, các phế tích Jinsha ở tỉnh Tứ Xuyên, và khu di tích văn hoá đế chế Yongzhou ở tỉnh Hồ Nam tất cả đều cho thấy bằng chứng về sự tồn tại của nền văn minh tiền Trung Quốc, và chúng khẳng định rằng riêng lịch sử canh tác lúa đã có từ 8.000-10.000 năm truớc đây. Điều này bác bỏ quan niệm về lịch sử 5.000 năm của Trung Quốc…
Bởi vậy, chúng ta có thể xác định rằng chúng ta là sản phẩm của nền văn hoá có nguồn gốc từ cách đây hơn 1 triệu năm, nền văn minh và tiến bộ với lịch sử hơn 10.000 năm, một dân tộc có 5.000 năm lịch sử, và một thực tế Trung Quốc với lịch sử hơn 2.000 năm. Đó là dân tộc Trung Quốc tự gọi mình như vậy.Là dòng dõi của Viêm và Hoàng, dân tộc Trung Quốc mà chúng ta tự hào thuộc về dân tộc đó. Nước Đức Hitle đã từng kiêu hãnh tự coi mình là chủng tộc siêu đẳng nhất trên Trái đất, nhưng thực tế là dân tộc chúng ta còn siêu việt hơn người Đức rất nhiều.
Đã có nhiều bài học, trong đó có bài học về sự sụp đổ của Liên Xô và Đông Âu, cũng như bài học về tại sao Đức và Nhật Bản lại thất bại trong Chiến tranh thế giới thứ Hai. Đã có rất nhiều cuộc thảo luận về sự sụp đổ của chủ nghĩa Cộng sản ở Liên Xô và các nước Đông Âu. Hôm nay, điều quan trọng với chúng ta là nói về các bài học thất bại của Đức và Nhật Bản.
Như mọi người đều biết, nước Đức phát xít cũng nhấn mạnh rất nhiều về vấn đề giáo dục cho dân chúng, đặc biệt là cho thế hệ trẻ. Đảng và Chính phủ quốc xã đã tổ chức và xây dựng rất nhiều thể chế tuyên truyền giáo dục, ví như Cơ quan hướng dẫn tuyên truyền quốc gia, Bộ Giáo dục và tuyên truyền quốc gia, Cục thanh tra nghiên cứu dư luận thế giới và giáo dục, và Cơ quan thông tin, tất cả đều nhằm gieo vào tâm trí của dân chúng Đức, từ học sinh các lớp tiểu học đến các trường đại học, là dân tộc Đức là chủng tộc thượng đẳng, và thuyết phục dân chúng rằng sứ mệnh lịch sử của chủng tộc Ariăng (Arian) là trở thành chủ nhân thế giới và thống trị toàn thế giới. Khi đó, nhân dân Đức thống nhất chặt chẽ hơn nhiều so với chúng ta hiện nay.
Tuy vậy, nước Đức đã bị thất bại nhục nhã cùng với nước Nhật Bản đồng minh. Vì sao vậy? Chúng ta đã đi tới một số kết luận tại các hội nghị nghiên cứu của Bộ Chính trị để nghiên cứu về các quy luật quyết định sự thăng trầm của các cường quốc lớn, và tìm cách phân tích sự phát triển nhanh chóng của Đức và Nhật Bản. Khi đó, chúng ra đã quyết định xây dựng mô hình đất nước dựa theo mô hình nước Đức, song chúng ta quyết không lặp lại các sai lầm mà người Đức đã mắc phải.
Xin nêu ra những nguyên nhân cơ bản dẫn tới thất bại của họ: Thứ nhất, họ có quá nhiều kẻ thù cùng một lúc, bởi họ đã không tuân theo nguyên tắc là chỉ tiêu diệt kẻ thù ở một thời điểm nhất định; Thứ hai, họ quá hăng hái, thiếu sự kiên nhẫn và bền gan, những phẩm chất đòi hỏi phải có để thực hiện những sự nghiệp vĩ đại; Thứ ba, khi tới thời điểm đòi hỏi phải tỏ ra tàn bạo thì họ lại tỏ ra quá mềm yếu, do vậy đã để lại những nguy cơ bộc lộ về sau này.
Giả dụ khi đó, Đức và Nhật có thể làm cho Mỹ đứng trung lập và tiến hành chiến tranh từng bước đối với Liên Xô. Nếu thực hiện chiến lược đó, tranh thủ thời gian đẩy nhanh các nghiên cứu và thành công trong việc làm chủ công nghệ hạt nhân và tên lửa, và sử dụng các vũ khí đó bất ngờ tấn công Mỹ và Liên Xô, thì khi đó Mỹ và Liên Xô đã không thể chống lại họ và buộc phải đầu hàng.
Đặc biệt là Nhật Bản đã phạm phải sai lầm khi tiến hành cuộc tấn công bất ngờ vào Trân Châu Cảng. Cuộc tấn công này không nhằm vào các phần có tầm quan trọng sống còn đối với nước Mỹ. Thay vì điều đó, cuộc tấn công này lôi kéo nước Mỹ tham gia chiến tranh, tham gia lực lượng những nước đào huyệt chôn vùi hai nhà nước phát xít Đức và Nhật Bản.
Tất nhiên, nếu họ không phạm 3 sai lầm nói trên và giành chiến thắng, thì lịch sử thế giới đã được viết theo hướng khác hẳn. Trong trường hợp đó, Trung Quốc sẽ không nằm trong tay chúng ta. Nhật Bản có thể chuyển thủ đô của họ tới Trung Quốc và thống trị toàn bộ đất nước Trung Quốc. Sau đó, Trung Quốc và toàn bộ châu Á dưới sự chỉ huy của Nhật Bản với toàn bộ sự thông minh của Phương Đông sẽ chinh phục phương Tây do Đức lãnh đạo và thống nhất toàn thế giới.
NGƯỜI TRUNG HOA LÀ CHỦNG TỘC THƯỢNG ĐẲNG?
Như vậy, những nguyên nhân cơ bản dẫn tới thất bại của Đức và Nhật Bản là lịch sử không sắp xếp để họ trở thành những chủ nhân của Trái Đất, vì tóm lại là họ không phải những chủng tộc ưu việt nhất.
So sánh về hình thức bên ngoài, Trung Quốc ngày nay giống một cách đáng ngại với người Đức trước kia. Cả hai đều coi mình là những dân tộc siêu đẳng nhất; cả hai đều có lịch sử bị các cường quốc bên ngoài bóc lột và do vậy đều mang nặng sự hận thù; cả hai đều cảm thấy mình sống trong một không gian rất không phù hợp; cả hai đều giương cao ngọn cờ dân tộc và chủ nghĩa xã hội và gắn cho mình nhãn hiệu chủ nghĩa xã hội quốc gia; cả hai đều có một nhà nước, một đảng, một nhà lãnh đạo, và một học thuyết.
Nhân dân Trung Quốc chúng ta thông minh hơn người Đức bởi xét về cơ bản, chúng ta là chủng tộc ưu việt hơn chủng tộc của họ. Đó là kết quả bởi việc chúng ta có lịch sử lâu đời hơn, đông dân hơn và đất đai rộng lớn hơn. Xét trên cơ sở này, tổ tiên của chúng ta để lại cho chúng ta hai di sản cốt yếu nhất, đó là chủ nghĩa vô thần và sự thống nhất vĩ đại. Đó chính là đức Khổng Tử, người đã sáng lập ra nền văn hoá Trung Quốc và để lại cho chúng ta những di sản này.
Hai di sản nói trên xác định rằng chúng ta có khả năng sống còn cao hơn Phương Tây. Đó là lý do giải thích tại sao chủng tộc Trung Quốc thịnh vượng lâu dài như vậy. Chúng ta có sứ mệnh không được để bị chôn vùi cả trên Thiên đàng cũng như trên Trái đất, bất kể đó là những thảm họa do thiên nhiên, do con người gây ra hay thảm hoạ quốc gia và cho dù chúng nghiêm trọng tới mức nào. Đây là ưu thế của chúng ta.
Ví dụ về phản ứng đối với chiến tranh chẳng hạn. Do cho tới nay nước Mỹ chưa hề nhìn thấy chiến tranh trên đất nước họ, nên một khi các kẻ thù vào đất Mỹ, họ có thể tiến tới tận thủ đô Oasinhtơn trước khi Quốc hội Mỹ kết thúc việc thoả luận và cho phép tổng thống Mỹ tuyên bố tình trạng chiến tranh. Tuy nhiên, đối với chúng ta, chúng ta sẽ không lãng phí thời gian vào những việc tầm thường như vậy. Đồng chí Đặng Tiểu Bình có lần đã nói: Lãnh đạo Đảng sẽ thông qua các quyết định một cách mau lẹ. Một khi các quyết định được thông qua, chúng sẽ được thực hiện ngay lập tức. Sẽ không có việc lãng phí thời gian vào những việc tầm thường như ở các nước tư bản. Đó là ưu thế của chúng ta.
Nguyên tắc tập trung dân chủ của Đảng Cộng sản Trung Quốc được xây dựng trên truyền thống và sự thống nhất vĩ đại. Mặc dù nước Đức phát xít cũng nhấn mạnh tới cơ chế tập trung ở mức cao khi ra các quyết định, song họ chỉ chú trọng tới quyền lực điều hành đất nước, nhưng lại coi thường cơ chế lãnh đạo tập thể ở cấp Trung ương. Bởi thế về sau này Hitle đã bị rất nhiều người phản bội, điều đó đã làm suy kiệt ghê gớm khả năng chiến tranh của Đức quốc xã.
Có một nhận xét rất nổi tiếng trong một bộ phim về sức mạnh và quyền uy: Những kẻ thù thường gặp nhau trên một con đường nhỏ, chỉ có những kẻ dũng cảm mới chiến thắng. Dạng chiến đấu với tinh thần một mất một còn đã cho phép chúng ta dành được quyền lực tại Trung Quốc đại lục. Số phận lịch sử đã quyết định rằng Trung Quốc và Mỹ sẽ không tránh khỏi đối đầu trên một con đường nhỏ và chiến đấu chống lại nhau! Mỹ, không giống như Nga và Nhật Bản, chưa bao giờ làm tổn thương Trung Quốc và cũng giúp Trung Quốc chống lại cuộc chiến đấu chống Nhật Bản. Tuy vậy, Mỹ tất yếu sẽ là trở ngại, trở ngại lớn nhất! Về lâu dài, quan hệ giữa Trung Quốc và Mỹ sẽ là đấu tranh một mất một còn.
Có thời, một số người Mỹ tới thăm Trung Quốc và tìm cách thuyết phục chúng ta rằng mối quan hệ giữa Trung Quốc và Mỹ là một quan hệ phụ thuộc lẫn nhau. Đồng chí Đặng Tiểu Bình khi đó đã trả lời một cách lịch sự: Hãy về nói với chính phủ của các ngài rằng Trung Quốc và Mỹ không có mối quan hệ phụ thuộc và hiểu biết lẫn nhau như vậy. Rõ ràng là đồng chí Đặng Tiểu Bình đã quá lịch sự, đồng chí ấy có thể nói thẳng: Quan hệ giữa Trung Quốc và Mỹ là một trong các quan hệ đấu tranh một mất một còn.
Tất nhiên, hiện giờ không phải là thời gian thích hợp để phá vỡ quan hệ với Mỹ. Chính sách cải cách và mở cửa ra thế giới bên ngoài của chúng ta còn phải dựa vào tiền vốn và công nghệ của họ, chúng ta vẫn còn cần tới nước Mỹ. Do vậy, chúng ta cần phải nỗ lực tăng cường quan hệ của chúng ta với Mỹ, học tập nước Mỹ trên mọi lĩnh vực và sử dụng Mỹ làm tấm gương cho việc tái thiết đất nước.
QUÉT SẠCH NƯỚC MỸ
Để giải quyết vấn đề nước Mỹ, chúng ta cần phải vượt lên trên những điều thông thường và hạn chế. Trong lịch sử, khi một nước đánh bại và chiếm đóng một nước khác, họ không thể giết hết dân chúng của nước bị chinh phục một cách hiệu quả bằng gươm hoặc giáo dài, hay thậm chí bằng súng tiểu liên hoặc súng máy. Bởi vì không thể giữ được vùng đất rộng lớn mà không duy trì người của mình trên vùng đất đó. Tuy nhiên, nếu chúng ta chinh phục nước Mỹ theo kiểu đó, chúng ta không thể đưa nhiều người Trung Quốc di cư tới Mỹ.
Chỉ có thể sử dụng nhũng biện pháp đặc biệt để quét sạch nước Mỹ và sau đó chúng ta mới có thể đưa nhân dân Trung Quốc tới đó. Đây là lựa chọn duy nhất đối với chúng ta. Đó không phải là vấn đề chúng ta muốn hay không muốn. Những biện pháp đặc biệt nào chúng ta có thể thực hiện để quét sạch nước Mỹ ? Những loại vũ khí thông thường như máy bay chiến đấu, đại bác, tên lửa hay tàu chiến không thể làm điều đó; các loại vũ khí huỷ diệt như vũ khí hạt nhân cũng không thể làm được như vậy. Chúng ta không ngu ngốc đến nỗi cùng tự huỷ diệt với Mỹ bằng cách sử dụng vũ khí hạt nhân, cho dù trên thực tế chúng ta vẫn tuyên bố giải quyết vấn đề Đài Loan bằng mọi giá.
Chỉ có thể sử dụng loại vũ khí không huỷ diệt, nhưng có khả năng giết nhiều người chúng ta mới có thể giành lấy nước Mỹ cho chúng ta. Công nghệ sinh học hiện đại đang phát triển nhanh chóng, và các loại vũ khí sinh học mới được phát minh nối tiếp nhau. Tất nhiên là chúng ta không để lãng phí thời gian; trong những năm qua chúng ta đã nắm được khả năng trở thành chủ nhân của các loại vũ khí này. Chúng ta có khả năng đạt được mục tiêu quét sạch nước Mỹ một cách hoàn toàn bất ngờ. Khi đồng chí Đặng Tiểu Bình còn sống, Ban chấp hành trung ương Đảng đã sáng suốt đưa ra quyết định đúng đắn là không phát triển các nhóm tàu sân bay và thay vào đó, tập trung phát triển các loại vũ khí có thể thủ tiêu hàng loạt dân chúng của nước thù địch.
Xét về mặt nhân đạo, chúng ta cần phải cảnh báo cho dân chúng Mỹ và thuyết phục họ rời khỏi nước Mỹ và để lại vùng đất họ từng sinh sống trên đó cho người Trung Quốc. Hoặc là ít nhất họ phải rời khỏi một nửa nước Mỹ để nhường phần đất đó cho người Trung Quốc, bởi phát hiện ra nước Mỹ lần đầu tiên chính là người Trung Quốc.
Nhưng sẽ phải làm điều đó như thế nào? Nếu chiến lược đó không thực hiện được, thì khi đó chúng ta chỉ còn một lựa chọn duy nhất. Tức là sử dụng những biện pháp kiên quyết để Quét sạch nước Mỹ và giành lấy nước Mỹ cho chúng ta ngay lập tức. Thực tế lịch sử của chúng ta cho thấy chừng nào chúng ta thực hiện được điều đó, không có nước nào trên thế giới có khả năng ngăn cản chúng ta. Hơn nữa, với một nước Mỹ với một tư cách thế giới bị mất đi, thì tất cả các kẻ thù khác buộc phải đầu hàng chúng ta.
Vũ khí sinh học là một loại vũ khí tàn ác chưa từng thấy, song nếu nước Mỹ không chết thì Trung Quốc sẽ bị huỷ diệt. Nếu nhân dân Trung Quốc bị mắc kẹt trên diện tích đất hiện nay, thì sự sụp đổ hoàn toàn của xã hội Trung Quốc chắc chắn sẽ xảy ra. Theo cách tính mô hình hoá trên máy tính của tác giả Yellow Peril, hơn một nửa dân số Trung Quốc sẽ chết, và con số đó sẽ là hơn 800 triệu người! Ngay sau khi giải phóng, vùng đất màu vàng của chúng ta có khoảng 500 triệu dân, trong khi dân số chính thức hiện nay là hơn 1,3 tỉ người. Khả năng của vùng đất màu vàng này đã đạt tới mức giới hạn của nó. Một ngày nào đó người ta có thể biết điều đó xảy ra nhanh chóng như thế nào, sự sụp đổ lớn có thể xảy ra vào bất kỳ thời điểm nào và hơn một nửa dân số của chúng ta sẽ buộc phải ra đi.
Chúng ta cần phải chuẩn bị sẵn sàng hai phương án. Nếu thành công trong việc sử dụng vũ khí sinh học bất ngờ tấn công nước Mỹ, chúng ta có thể giảm thiểu thiệt hại về người trong cuộc chiến tranh với Mỹ. Nếu trong trường hợp cuộc tấn công đó thất bại, và kích động một cuộc phản công bằng vũ khí hạt nhân từ nước Mỹ, Trung Quốc sẽ phải gánh chịu một thảm hoạ, trong đó hơn một nửa dân số sẽ chết. Bởi vậy, chúng ta cần phải sẵn sàng với các hệ thống phòng không để bảo vệ các thành phố lớn và vừa của Trung Quốc…"
Trì Hạo Điền
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét